Feature
THE THEORY OF AN OVERPOPULATED EARTH
By Matthew Eloyi
For so long, overpopulation has been blamed for almost everything including poverty, unemployment, scarce resources, birth control, abortion, and even the one-child policy that was once implemented in China. But is the earth really overpopulated? To answer this question, we probably need to remind ourselves of what overpopulation really means.
If my elementary school teachers didn’t lie to me, then overpopulation is an unpleasant situation in which the existing human population exceeds the Earth’s carrying capacity. Also, in our high schools and colleges, we were/are taught in Economics that overpopulation is when a country’s population is higher than its available resources. However, according to research, the world population as of April 2022 stands at 7.9 billion while the earth can actually accommodate over 10 billion people given its spatial and resource base. If this is the case, then the claim that the earth is overpopulated is nothing but a mental conception.
For a very long time, the so-called international community has been bombarding us with incessant propaganda that “there are too many people” in the world. They claim that overpopulation is to blame for everything ranging from poverty to climate change to the extinction of rain forests.
Only a few have thought of the danger that population reduction can pose. Population decline is likely to contribute to international instability as nations struggle to acquire people to perform some jobs, operate infrastructure, and take care of the elderly. The Russian invasion of Ukraine may be the most recent example of this problem.
Russia is in desperate need of people. It has a population of only 146 million people, compared to 332 million in the US. Despite having a population slightly lower than Bangladesh, Russia has the biggest land mass of any country on the planet (6.3 million square miles). It’s also losing folks. It has a total fertility rate of 1.58, compared to 2.1 for replacement-level fertility. Its population is dwindling at a rate of roughly 100,000 people per year. According to United Nations figures, Russia had the world’s highest rate of abortions per woman of reproductive age in 2010. Russia’s population would have grown by about 30% if it had succeeded in absorbing Ukraine’s 43 million inhabitants (before the invasion). What makes it more appealing is that, according to Putin, the Ukrainians cannot racially be differentiated from Russians.
China, in addition to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, is another example. Its one-child policy, which lasted till 2016, severely harmed the country’s fertility rate, which is now at an anemic 1.3. In 2021, only 10.6 million babies were born in a country of 1.4 billion people, a record low and down from 12.2 million in 2019. The number of working-age people is likely to fall to half of the population by 2050 while the percentage of those above the retirement age is projected to reach 39% of the population, according to demographers. As a result, China’s working-age population will be proportionally smaller, with the burden of caring for both the young and the elderly. There is already a labour shortage in China. Consider what the country would be like if there were less and fewer employees to maintain an aging population.
There had been a lot of conspiracy theories of deliberate population reduction. Top on the list is Malthusianism. This theory, which was named after the early nineteenth-century scholar Thomas Malthus, proposed that having too many people in the world causes a slew of problems, including hunger, malnutrition, disease, and conflict. According to the hypothesis, the world’s population rises exponentially while food supply does not, resulting in global hunger. Malthusianism has given the philosophical underpinnings of all later versions of population theory, and was not entirely refuted until the advent of modern farming techniques in the twentieth century.
Eugenics – the belief that not all races are equal and that the “bad” races must die out to make place for the “good,” was another conspiracy theory of deliberate population reduction. The “bad” races usually corresponded to those who were poorer and darker than eugenics proponents. Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood who openly espoused racist sentiments and was loved by the Nazi leadership was an early proponent of this notion. Of course, the Nazi government gave eugenics a terrible name, so population theory faded into obscurity, resurfaced in the 1950s with the approval of the American political and intellectual establishment. It was given a new term, the population explosion, which alluded to Malthus’ ideas but still targeted darker-skinned people in emerging countries. Rather than just stating that the world would run out of food, it was now proposed that the globe would run out of practically everything, including food, natural resources, and eventually space to roam around in. The movement was propelled by the “population bomb” notion from the 1960s to the early 1990s and beyond.
The so-called “Population Bomb” was never detonated. Now we must cope with the issues of aging populations and worldwide instability brought on by the decline in birthrates. These issues will become apparent to everyone, even the most adamant secularists, sooner or later, and it will be clear that only people of religion had the foresight to perceive the problem – and the fortitude to address it. This is because religious people, such as traditional Catholics, evangelical Christians, Mormons, and Orthodox Jews, are the only set of people that have kept the very first mandate from God in the Book of Genesis that we should be fruitful and multiply. And the truth is, whether you believe in God or not, people still believe that God holds all the Aces and He decides everything. So, it is high time we accepted the fact that there is little we can do to change the world or play God.
Africa
Customs hands over illicit drugs worth N117.59m to NDLEA
The Nigeria Customs Service (NCS), Ogun Area 1 Command, has handed over illicit drugs worth N117.59 million to the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA).
The Comptroller of the command, Mr James Ojo, disclosed this during the handing over of the drugs to Mr Olusegun Adeyeye, the Commander of NDLEA, Idiroko Special Area Command, in Abeokuta, Ogun, on Friday.
Ojo said the customs handed over the seized cannabis and tramadol tablets to the Idiroko Special Command for further investigation in line with the standard operating procedures and inter-agency collaboration.
He said the illicit drugs were seized in various strategic locations between January and November 21, 2024, in Ogun State.
He added that the illicit drugs were abandoned at various locations, including the Abeokuta axis, the Agbawo/Igankoto area of Yewa North Local Government Area, and Imeko Afton axis.
Ojo said that the seizure of the cannabis sativa and tramaling tablets, another brand of tramadol, was made possible through credible intelligence and strategic operations of the customs personnel.
“The successful interception of these dangerous substances would not have been possible without the robust collaboration and support from our intelligence units, local informants and sister agencies.
“These landmark operations are testament to the unwavering dedication of the NCS to safeguard the health and well-being of our citizens and uphold the rule of law,” he said.
He said the seizures comprised 403 sacks and 6,504 parcels, weighing 7,217.7 kg and 362 packs of tramaling tablets of 225mg each, with a total Duty Paid Value of N117,587,405,00.
He described the height of illicit drugs smuggling in the recent time as worrisome.
This, he said, underscores the severity of drug trafficking within the borders.
“Between Oct. 13 and Nov. 12 alone, operatives intercepted a total of 1,373 parcels of cannabis sativa, weighing 1,337kg and 362 packs of tramaling tablets of 225mg each,” he said.
Ojo said the seizures had disrupted the supply chain of illicit drugs, thereby mitigating the risks those substances posed to the youth, families and communities.
He lauded the synergy between its command, security agencies and other stakeholders that led to the remarkable achievements.
Ojo also commended the Comptroller General of NCS for creating an enabling environment for the command to achieve the success.
Responding, Adeyeye, applauded the customs for achieving the feat.
Adeyeye pledged to continue to collaborate with the customs to fight against illicit trade and drug trafficking in the state.
Africa
Ann-Kio Briggs Faults Tinubu for Scrapping Niger Delta Ministry
Prominent Niger Delta human rights activist and environmentalist, Ann-Kio Briggs, has criticised President Bola Tinubu’s decision to scrap the Ministry of Niger Delta, describing it as ill-advised and detrimental to the oil-rich region.
Briggs expressed her concerns during an appearance on Inside Sources with Laolu Akande, a socio-political programme aired on Channels Television.
“The Ministry of Niger Delta was created by the late (President Umaru) Yar’Adua. There was a reason for the creation. So, just removing it because the president was advised. I want to believe that he was advised because if he did it by himself, that would be terribly wrong,” she stated.
President Tinubu, in October, dissolved the Ministry of Niger Delta and replaced it with the Ministry of Regional Development, which is tasked with overseeing all regional development commissions, including the Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC), North-West Development Commission, and North-East Development Commission.
Briggs questioned the rationale behind the restructuring, expressing concerns about its feasibility and implications. “But that’s not going to be the solution because who is going to fund the commissions? Is it the regions because it is called the Regional Development Ministry? Is it the states in the regions? What are the regions because we don’t work with regions right now; we are working with geopolitical zones,” she remarked.
She added, “Are we going back to regionalism? If we are, we have to discuss it. The president can’t decide on his own to restructure Nigeria. If we are restructuring Nigeria, the president alone can’t restructure Nigeria, he has to take my opinion and your opinion into consideration.”
Briggs also decried the longstanding neglect of the Niger Delta despite its significant contributions to Nigeria’s economy since 1958. “The Niger Delta has been developing Nigeria since 1958. We want to use our resources to develop our region; let regions use their resources to develop themselves,” she asserted.
Reflecting on the various bodies established to address the region’s development, Briggs lamented their failure to deliver meaningful progress. She highlighted the Niger Delta Basin Authority, the Oil Mineral Producing Areas Development Commission (OMPADEC), and the NDDC as examples of ineffective interventions.
“NDDC was created by Olusegun Obasanjo…There was OMPADEC before NDDC. OMPADEC was an agency. Before OMPADEC, there was the Basin Authority…These authorities were created to help us. Were we helped by those authorities? No, we were not,” she said.
Briggs further described the NDDC as an “ATM for failed politicians, disgruntled politicians, and politicians that have had their electoral wins taken away from them and given to somebody else.”
Her remarks underscore the deep-seated frustrations in the Niger Delta, where residents continue to advocate for greater control over their resources and improved governance.
Feature
Securing the Digital Frontier: Global and Nigerian Cybersecurity Landscape
“Cybersecurity is much more than a matter of IT; it’s a matter of national security.”
— Pauline Neville-Jones, former UK Minister for Security
By Ernest Ogezi
As the digital landscape rapidly expands, the global cybersecurity situation has reached a critical juncture. In an increasingly interconnected world, the scale and frequency of cyber threats continue to escalate, affecting individuals, businesses, and governments alike. October, designated as National Cybersecurity Awareness Month, serves as a stark reminder of the growing importance of cybersecurity and the collective responsibility we all share in securing our digital spaces.
Globally, the numbers paint a grim picture. According to a 2024 report by IBM Security, the average cost of a data breach has soared to $4.88 million, marking the highest figure ever recorded. This staggering figure underscores the severe financial implications of cyber incidents. Additionally, the number of data compromises worldwide in the first half of 2024 rose to 1,571, a 14% increase from 2023. These statistics highlight the growing sophistication of cyberattacks and the pressing need for more robust defenses. Ransomware, phishing, and advanced persistent threats (APTs) continue to dominate the threat landscape, with attackers constantly evolving their tactics.
The situation in Nigeria mirrors global trends but presents its own set of unique challenges. As Africa’s largest economy and a rapidly growing digital hub, Nigeria has experienced a surge in cybercrime activity. In 2022 alone, the Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System (NIBSS) recorded over 60,000 cyberattacks on financial institutions, amounting to billions in losses. The rise of digital banking, e-commerce, and the widespread adoption of mobile devices have made the country a prime target for cybercriminals. In response to these challenges, the Nigerian government has taken significant steps to bolster the nation’s cybersecurity infrastructure, with the National Information Technology Development Agency (NITDA) playing a pivotal role.
NITDA, the agency responsible for regulating and promoting Nigeria’s IT ecosystem, has been at the forefront of the country’s cybersecurity efforts. In line with its mandate to foster a safe and secure digital environment, NITDA has implemented a series of initiatives aimed at enhancing cybersecurity awareness, promoting best practices, and strengthening the country’s defense against cyber threats. The agency’s role in cybersecurity is multi-faceted, focusing on policy development, capacity building, and public-private partnerships.
One of NITDA’s key contributions has been the development of Nigeria’s National Cybersecurity Strategy, which outlines the country’s approach to combating cyber threats. The strategy emphasizes the importance of protecting critical infrastructure, safeguarding personal data, and building cyber resilience. It also focuses on creating a culture of cybersecurity awareness across all sectors of society. NITDA has been instrumental in implementing this strategy by working with stakeholders to ensure its effectiveness.
In October 2024, as part of National Cybersecurity Awareness Month, NITDA launched a nationwide awareness campaign to educate individuals and organizations on the importance of cybersecurity. The campaign, which aligns with the global theme “Secure Our World,” emphasizes the shared responsibility of all Nigerians in protecting the digital landscape. Through workshops, webinars, and educational materials, NITDA is working to equip citizens with the knowledge and tools they need to safeguard their digital assets.
A key focus of NITDA’s efforts has been the protection of Nigeria’s critical infrastructure, including the financial, energy, and healthcare sectors. Cyberattacks on these sectors can have devastating consequences, not only financially but also in terms of public safety. In response, NITDA has collaborated with both national and international organizations to enhance the cybersecurity frameworks of these industries, ensuring that they are equipped to defend against evolving threats.
Beyond its focus on critical infrastructure, NITDA has made significant strides in fostering a cybersecurity-conscious workforce. Through its Cybersecurity Awareness Program, the agency has trained thousands of IT professionals, law enforcement officers, and government personnel on the latest cybersecurity trends and defense techniques. This capacity-building initiative is crucial for ensuring that Nigeria has a skilled workforce capable of responding to the ever-changing threat landscape.
Despite these efforts, the scale and complexity of cyber threats continue to grow. The rise of ransomware attacks, data breaches, and phishing schemes poses significant risks to both the public and private sectors. NITDA recognizes that cybersecurity is not a static field but one that requires constant vigilance and adaptation. The agency is therefore committed to continuously improving Nigeria’s cybersecurity posture through policy updates, enhanced defenses, and ongoing education.
-
Business3 years ago
Facebook, Instagram Temporarily Allow Posts on Ukraine War Calling for Violence Against Invading Russians or Putin’s Death
-
Headlines3 years ago
Nigeria, Other West African Countries Facing Worst Food Crisis in 10 Years, Aid Groups Say
-
Foreign3 years ago
New York Consulate installs machines for 10-year passport
-
Technology2 months ago
Zero Trust Architecture in a Remote World: Securing the New Normal
-
Entertainment2 years ago
Phyna emerges winner of Big Brother Naija Season 7
-
Business6 months ago
Nigeria Customs modernisation project to check extortion of traders
-
Business8 months ago
We generated N30.2 bn revenue in three months – Kano NCS Comptroller
-
Headlines5 months ago
Philippines’ Vice President Sara Duterte resigns from Cabinet